Issue List

No.11
＜Title＞中位投票者モデル vs. 平均投票者モデル ―県別単独事業費を用いた推定―

No.11 March 1999

＜Author＞
長峯 純一 Junichi Nagamine
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（1999年3月現在）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University (as of March, 1999)
奥井 克美 Katsuyoshi Okui
追手門学院大学経済学部 専任講師 （1999年3月現在）

CiNii国立情報学研究所論文情報ナビゲータ［サイニィ］（1~6,8~14,17~18,20~24,26~34号はコチラで検索してください） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.12
＜Title＞京都議定書における伸縮的手法と国内排出削減制度の構築Flexibility Mechanisms in the Kyoto Protocol and the Design of Domestic Policies to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

No.12 July 1999

＜Author＞
天野 明弘 Akihiro Amano
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（1999年7月現在）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University (as of July, 1999)

＜Abstract＞
The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, adopted in 1997, introduced four flexibility mechanisms in order to support target reductions of greenhouse gas emissions for Annex I parties in the first commitment period. Details of these mechanisms, however, have yet to be decided, and international negotiations have been going on to settle the questions at the sixth conference of the Parties in the fall of 2000. This paper reviews major issues related to these flexibility mechanisms with a view to gaining insights in designing domestic policies and measures to comply with the quantitative emission reduction commitments. Early start of domestic emissions trading and a review of existing energy taxes would be helpful to promote a smooth transition to international trading systems and an efficient attainment of the target reduction commitments.

CiNii国立情報学研究所論文情報ナビゲータ［サイニィ］（1~6,8~14,17~18,20~24,26~34号はコチラで検索してください） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.13
＜Title＞財政赤字と省益最大化：税収予測からの検証

No.13 October 1999

＜Author＞
柴田 愛子 Aiko Shibata
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（1999年10月現在）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University (as of October, 1999)
柴田 弘文 Hirofumi Shibata
立命館大学政策科学部 教授（1999年10月現在）
Professor, College of Policy Science, Ritsumeikan University (as of October, 1999)

CiNii国立情報学研究所論文情報ナビゲータ［サイニィ］（1~6,8~14,17~18,20~24,26~34号はコチラで検索してください） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.14
＜Title＞いじめの経済分析 ―傍観者達のモデルと実験的検証―

No.14 October 1999

＜Author＞
柴田 愛子 Aiko Shibata
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（1999年10月現在）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University (as of October, 1999)
森 徹 Tohru Mori
名古屋市立大学経済学部 教授（1999年10月現在）
曽山 典子 Noriko Soyama
天理大学教養部 常勤講師 （1999年10月現在）
岡村 誠 Makoto Okamura
神戸市立外国語大学 教授（1999年10月現在）

＜Abstract＞
Bullying in school which would be detrimental to the development of human resources is a serious problem in Japan as well as in other countries. Bystanders rarely report instances of bullying to teachers, parents and other authorities.
In our study, bystander behavior is modeled as a non-cooperative game by assuming that bullying can be stopped by a teacher only when more than a certain number of students report the instances.
Every bystander stands to gain from the resolution of bullying activity (i.e. the consumption of public goods). But when a bystander reports this activity, that bystander will have to deal with psychological and / or physical costs (i.e. the private costs) if the total number of reports falls below the required minimum. We see that one of the two stable symmetric Nash equilibria is reached, depending on the threshold numbers, payoffs and the costs of reporting. At one equilibrium, all bystanders report the instances of bullying to their teacher, and at the other equilibrium, no one reports. The results of our experiments support our model and the expected payoff-maximizing behavior of bystanders.
From this the major policy implication reached is that by lowering the number of students in a classroom, reporting activities of bystanders would increase. Other policy suggestions which could serve to increase reporting activity of bystanders include reducing the threshold number for reporting from students, increasing the disutility of students’ observing bullying behavior, and mitigating the psychological and / or physical costs for the reporting of bullying.

CiNii国立情報学研究所論文情報ナビゲータ［サイニィ］（1~6,8~14,17~18,20~24,26~34号はコチラで検索してください） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.15
＜Title＞道路投資配分の政治的要因

No.15 November 1999

＜Author＞
長峯 純一 Junichi Nagamine
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（1999年11月）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University
(as of November, 1999)

KGUR関西学院大学リポジトリのワーキングペーパー一覧（7,15,16,19,25と35以降の号はコチラで閲覧ができます） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.16
＜Title＞地方交付税の算定構造・配分構造に関する分析

No.16 November 1999

＜Author＞
長峯 純一 Junichi Nagamine
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（1999年11月）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University

KGUR関西学院大学リポジトリのワーキングペーパー一覧（7,15,16,19,25と35以降の号はコチラで閲覧ができます） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.17
＜Title＞An Economic Analysis of Non-Good Samaritan Behavior: Theory and Experiment

No.17 March 2000

＜Author＞
柴田 愛子 Aiko Shibata
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（2000年3月現在）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University (as of March, 2000)
森 徹 Tohru Mori
名古屋市立大学経済学部 教授（2000年3月現在）
岡村 誠 Makoto Okamura
神戸市立外国語大学 教授（2000年3月現在）
曽山 典子 Noriko Soyama
天理大学教養部 常勤講師 （2000年3月現在）

CiNii国立情報学研究所論文情報ナビゲータ［サイニィ］（1~6,8~14,17~18,20~24,26~34号はコチラで検索してください） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.18
＜Title＞二酸化炭素国内排出削減メカニズムの確立に向けてGreen Climate Program: A Proposal Toward Establishing Domestic Permit-Trading System for Carbon Dioxide Emission Abatement

No.18 March 2000

＜Author＞
天野 明弘 Akihiro Amano
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（2000年3月現在）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University (as of March, 2000)

＜Abstract＞
Leading Annex I countries of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change have been giving serious considerations on some domestic mechanisms such as carbon taxes and emissions trading systems that can assure compliance with the emission reduction commitments of the Kyoto Protocol. In this paper I propose a policy package, “Green Climate Program,” that is centered around a domestic emissions trading system in Japan with accompanying measures to cope with various equity considerations. It is shown that a hybrid approach that puts together both down-stream and up-stream approaches and grandfathering and auction allocation methods can combine efficiency and equity aspects in an appropriate manner, which will enable to give abatement incentives to diverse agents and to invite broad participation. Various charge schemes are also supplemented to mitigate adjustment difficulties.

CiNii国立情報学研究所論文情報ナビゲータ［サイニィ］（1~6,8~14,17~18,20~24,26~34号はコチラで検索してください） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.19
＜Title＞ニュー・ミレニアム・ラウンド交渉の方向性と展望（TRIPS、EC及びTBTについて）

No.19 May 2000

＜Author＞
中野 幸紀 Yukinori Nakano
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（2000年5月現在）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University (as of May, 2000)

KGUR関西学院大学リポジトリのワーキングペーパー一覧（7,15,16,19,25と35以降の号はコチラで閲覧ができます） 外部のサイトへリンク

No.20
＜Title＞貿易政策と環境政策：相互支援の可能性Trade and Environmental Policies: Can They Be Mutually Supportive?

No.20 September 2000

＜Author＞
天野 明弘 Akihiro Amano
関西学院大学総合政策学部 教授（2000年9月現在）
Professor, School of Policy Studies, Kwansei Gakuin University
(as of September, 2000)

＜Abstract＞
Agenda 21 adopted at the Earth Summit in 1992 highly regarded the importance of open and liberal world economic system for sustainable development, but at the same time reiterated that trade and environmental policies should be mutually supportive. However, a greater number of multinational environmental agreements have been incorporating trade measures with potential conflicts with the global trading system; and settlements of trade disputes often irritate environmental groups. This paper argues that the GATT/WTO principle of non-discrimination among “like products” has been a major cause of difficulties. Since more and more economic measures are expected for use to deal with environmental externalities, products with different processes and production methods must be defined as unlike products. Clear international agreements concerning the need for complementing market failures will be able to change the current GATT/WTO rules toward a more mutually supportive direction.

CiNii国立情報学研究所論文情報ナビゲータ［サイニィ］（1~6,8~14,17~18,20~24,26~34号はコチラで検索してください） 外部のサイトへリンク